KISS AND TELL: numerous pupils stated they certainly were generally speaking dissatisfied aided by the hookup tradition.
In a September 2012 article, “Boys in the Side,” when you look at the Atlantic mag, Hanna Rosin, writer of the recently released guide “The End of Men,” casts an eye that is critical the “hookup culture” of college campuses, arguing that the prevalence of casual intimate encounters is “an motor of feminine progress—one being harnessed and driven by females by themselves.”
After interviewing lots of undergraduate and graduate pupils at organizations maybe not unlike Bowdoin, Rosin concluded that “feminist progress now mostly is dependent on the presence of the hookup tradition. And also to a surprising level, it is women—not men—who are perpetuating the tradition, specially in school, cannily manipulating it to help make room with regards to their success, keeping their ends at heart.”
Over a dozen interviews with Bowdoin pupils from a myriad of social teams, course years and sexual orientations implies that it is not usually the instance at Bowdoin, and therefore lots of men and women can be dissatisfied with all the hookup tradition right right here, mostly due to an unspoken collection of guidelines that dictate exactly exactly how students begin navigating intercourse and dating in the university.
The interviewed pupils unilaterally consented that “hooking up” can mean “anything from kissing to using sex,” as Phoebe Kranefuss ’16 put it, and it is usually a casual” encounter that is“very. As Eric Edelman writes in the op-ed this week, “Hookups may have just as much or as meaning that is little you add into them. They could use the kind of friendly hellos, sloppy goodbyes, clear overtures of great interest, or careful explorations.”