Recently we’ve written an investigation paper and posted a preprint in the Arxiv to have some peer that is non-official and also to boost the quality of our paper. Till now we have maybe maybe perhaps not submitted this paper to virtually any journal or conference(it really is unpublished), but our company is thinking about sending it to a meeting.
While testing our paper for plagiarism utilizing free websites, we obtained outcomes showing 83% plagiarism through the variation we posted in the Arxiv. The software is saying that we plagiarised our own paper in other words. We additionally attempted pulling straight down our paper through the Arxiv to prevent this plagiarism, but it’s impossible. Does that suggest our paper will get refused by all seminars? What should we do?
This concern originated in our site for expert mathematicians.
3 Responses 3
The problem as it is understood by me:
You composed a manuscript A and uploaded it into the arXiv. You may not intend to publish manuscript the in a journal or conference.
You later on had written a manuscript B. you would like to submit B up to a seminar. This manuscript B shows 83% overlap with manuscript A.
Therefore, you might be concerned to own issues with publishing manuscript B.
While both are work there clearly was a possible risk someone may think you’re committing self-plagiarism. (As in the event that you can you make an effort to publish write a essay for me both the and B in a journal or conference there may be a genuine problem.) to prevent this perception the status should be made by you of an obvious.
This via can be done by you:
Adding a footnote to your front page of a stating that it really is a draft/technical report/etc. and never meant for book. You can even add this remark as «comment» when you look at the meta information on arXiv. Читать далее All ABout Plagiarism from preprint of paper through the Arxiv